"TheHondaBro" (wwaveform)
04/15/2016 at 12:12 • Filed to: None | 4 | 11 |
But the Boeing 747 does.
Therefore, Boeing 747 > Calculus
Chariotoflove
> TheHondaBro
04/15/2016 at 12:16 | 2 |
“When you think about it, Calculus doesn’t really exist.”
But when you stop thinking about it, it does. That’s why it stays on your todo list no matter how long you procrastinate.
Azrek
> TheHondaBro
04/15/2016 at 12:20 | 0 |
The 8th Dimension believes in you...and math.
unclevanos (Ovaltine Jenkins)
> TheHondaBro
04/15/2016 at 12:20 | 0 |
If it doesn’t exist then Leibniz and Newton didn’t exist.
gawdzillla
> TheHondaBro
04/15/2016 at 12:21 | 1 |
Problem: You can’t have said 747 without calculus
Flyboy is FAA certified insane
> TheHondaBro
04/15/2016 at 12:25 | 4 |
You can certainly fly a 747 without calculus, but without calculus the 747 would not exist.
Thus Schroedinger’s airplane
Highlander-Datsuns are Forever
> TheHondaBro
04/15/2016 at 12:34 | 2 |
Calculus is very useful for calculating the area and volume of odd shapes. That being said I haven’t used it since college.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> TheHondaBro
04/15/2016 at 13:18 | 0 |
A Boeing 747 flying at 30,000 feet passes directly over a person while flying at 250 meters per second. Six seconds after it is directly over the person, how fast is the plane moving away from the person?
TheHondaBro
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/15/2016 at 13:19 | 1 |
*holds arms wide out* About this much.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> TheHondaBro
04/15/2016 at 13:21 | 0 |
That’s a unit of distance.
phobos512
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/15/2016 at 13:22 | 0 |
How many dozens of apples are in a single dozen of apples?
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> phobos512
04/15/2016 at 13:25 | 0 |
One?